There are a number of alternatives that a Mistress could employ in putting her trusty male submissive on a forced chastity regimen. The method that most appeals to me is the use of a locked chastity tube device. The trade photograph I used above gives even someone who is not familiar with these the basic idea of how they work. The photograph is of a CB-6000 and the CB series is really it appears, the gold standard in the particular arena. There are several models to choose from, the CB-6000 being the top of the line in these models, but only one of those available in the series. Less expensive but equally effective models are available. The CB series consists of a molded clear plastic tube which is fitted over the flaccid penis and then connected to a cock ring affair that goes over the base of the penis and behind the balls. At the connection point, a point is provided where a lock can be attached. The device does several things simultaneously. It completely removes a man’s access to his penis and stops masturbation in its tracks. It also serves to retard erections by keeping the penis encased. Provisions have been made in the design to allow for urination and the conduct of personal hygiene while the device is installed. One benefit of the CB series is the plastic construction which makes them airport screening friendly. Chastity devices are available from other manufactures that are made of stainless metal construction but these would of course lead to embarrassing invasive searches if the man wearing on of those has to fly frequently or pass through other security screenings in the course of his employment. I must admit the metal ones do look very sexy to me and I think the feel would be great. Yet, I have to admit the plastic CB devices are more practical.
At least to me one of the most erotic attractions of these devices is the “padlock” feature. One’s Mistress becomes the official “key holder” of a serialized padlock. It is recommended that some method be created to provide for access to a key by the male in extreme emergencies, but for all intents and purpose, the mistress is the sole key holder. The device cannot be removed without either the key or by cutting off the lock. The later is discouraged by the fact that the special locks have serial numbers so the male could not possibly cut his off and then simply replace it with a similar one to hide the fact that he had removed his device. So quite literally, the man is at the mercy of his key holder
I truly believe I would enjoy the experience of one of these devices which would help to control my orgasm as well as even eliminate opportunities for erections. As most men do, I tend to consider erections as something I must do something about. As I have shared before, I like most men, am a prisoner of my penis. Arousal continually tempts me weakening resolve and stealing attention away from the needs and desires of my Mistress.
As a virile, sexual, and easily aroused submissive man, I'm horny a good part of the time. One effective way for my dominant female partner to take complete control of my penis and orgasms would be to put me into a physical chastity device removing not just the temptation of orgasm but masturbation as well. Keeping me “locked up” would result in my sexual release being prescribed for me on terms dictated by my dominant female.
Some release is needed to maintain health as having orgasms are a part of maintaining healthy prostate health for men. I have seen conflicting information but generally it seems that most people who practice orgasm denial suggest men should be allowed to orgasm at least every two weeks to a month for health reasons. However, there is also another intriguing activity, known as prostate “milking” which can accomplish the prostate health function without the male actually experiencing a typical erotically produced orgasm. But I’ll save that topic for another day.
For Dominant Women: Would you consider putting your submissive man into physical chastity? If so, how often would you allow him sexual release?